Independent Distributor - Supply Chain's Best Friend or Worst Enemy?


Reading time ( words)

I started earning my living brokering electronic components in 2001. I quickly learned that the term “broker” came with some very negative preconceptions, such as the idea that brokers were unscrupulous liars, cheaters, etc. While much has changed about the component industry, much remains the same.

As independent electronics distributors come under increased scrutiny, I am often asked about the changes I have seen since my early days in the industry. Generally speaking, the loudest voice against independent distributors comes--as it always has--from the powerful presence of authorized distributors. This segment of the industry views independent distributors as both a threat to their bottom line and an easy target for the scapegoating of the component industry’s ills. However, due to the fact that high-quality independent distributors are critical to supply chain-wide counterfeit mitigation, I think it is pertinent to discuss the things that companies should consider before working with brokers or independent distributors. This advice is especially beneficial when it comes from the perspective of someone with first-hand industry knowledge and experience. Additionally, I wish to add some insight as to what I believe are legitimate criticisms of independent distributors and what are misconceptions that do not represent the whole story.

To discuss the industry of independent component distribution, some terms must first be defined. A broker is simply defined as “an agent who negotiates contracts of purchase and sale.” This term generally applies to independent distributors who sell parts outside a set arrangement with an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) or an original component manufacturer (OCM). Authorized distributors, on the other hand, have a direct arrangement with a manufacturer, often in the form of a franchise agreement. This distinction is important when it comes to counterfeit mitigation.

Read the full column here.


Editor's Note: This column originally appeared in the May 2014 issue of SMT Magazine.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

This Month in SMT007 Magazine: Robustness Is Not the Same as Reliability

09/02/2020 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
Bob Neves discusses a disconnect he sees in reliability testing between what’s being tested and what happens out in the field, as well as why most reliability tests these days should instead be considered robustness tests.

Just Ask Joe: The Occam Process

08/25/2020 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
First, we asked you to send in your questions for Happy Holden. Now, it’s Joe Fjelstad’s turn! Inventor, columnist, instructor, and founder of Verdant Electronics, Joe has been involved with rigid PCBs and flexible circuits for decades, and he’s ready to share some of his knowledge with our readers. We hope you enjoy “Just Ask Joe.”

What’s Driving AOI Innovation and Collaboration?

03/25/2020 | Brent Fischthal, Koh Young America
When we look at the optical inspection market growth trajectory, we can see how process challenges helped create innovations. For example, solder paste inspection (SPI) has undergone a shift from 2D to 3D because the 2D inspection technologies manufacturers traditionally used to collect solder deposit images could not solve shadowing problems. Thus, companies developed 3D SPI to capture the printed solder paste height to accurately measure the total volume of paste printed. Several years later, we see the same need for surface-mounted component inspection with AOI systems.



Copyright © 2020 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.