3D Additive Electronics Manufacturing: Are We Nearing an Inflection Point?

Reading time ( words)

Dr. Amanda Schrand

As a senior engineering group leader for the resilient additive development program at Eglin Air Force Base, Dr. Amanda Schrand spoke about the use of 3D printing for the survivability of printed hybrid electronics. As part of the Airforce Research Lab, her program also works with all branches of the military. She spoke about proof of concept and seemed to be pleased with the success of printed antennas. They use several 3D printing devices, including the nScrypt printer.


Erik Handy

Erik Handy represents SI2 Technologies, which designs, develops, and manufactures RF/microwave and sensor systems for military air, land, and sea, as well as space applications using 3D printing. SI2 uses commercially available and designs its own new materials. Erik discussed considerations for selecting printable materials. Regarding electrical conductor materials, for example, to maximize conductivity for high power handling while minimizing surface roughness for RF efficiency, dielectrics must minimize the loss tangent and provide a dielectric constant.

Erik also spoke about the challenges associated with co-printing dissimilar materials such as processing temperature mismatches, layer to layer adhesion, and more. Then, he gave examples of applications for printed RF systems.

Curtis Hill

Curtis Hill works at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, where one area of focus is using 3D printing in space manufacturing—both on the ISS and “beyond,” with “beyond” referring to inhabiting the moon and, by 2035, Mars. He spoke about the development of flexible sensors that can monitor astronaut health using 3D additive electronics. NASA is also developing the ability to print various metals and its own inks.


Dr. Mark Mirotznik

A professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Delaware, Dr. Mark Mirotznik discussed the progress and challenges of 3D-printed electronics for RF devices and systems. He asked, “Since we have gotten so good at making circuits that are low cost and high volume, then why do we need 3D additive?”


One reason, he said, might be the need for small-volume labor-intensive devices and, of course, getting a replacement part in an area such as the ISS where it might take months to have it delivered. His team, however, is focusing on a far more interesting reason: Having the ability to make things where there is no other way to do so. Think about no longer being bound to two-dimensional circuits.


Another reason centers on the ability to use far more advanced materials, higher-conductivity inks, printable thermoplastics, and pastes with a range of electric and magnetic properties. Soon, 3D-printed circuits will enable capabilities that today’s standard circuit fabrication just cannot do. Mark discussed the ability of 3D printing to generate “smart munitions”—ammunition with built-in sensors—as well as other interesting topics.

Dr. Paul Parsons

Dr. Paul Parsons, director of materials research at DeLUX Advanced Manufacturing, was the final speaker. He also works with the University of Delaware on the strength of 3D-printed electronics for RF applications. To begin, he noted that until recently, 3D printing of electronics had been dominated by single material systems, which require parts to move and then deposit dissimilar materials such as dielectrics and conductors. This makes it difficult to incorporate internal features.

However, the emergence of multilateral systems enables the fabrication of complex printed circuit or RF structures within a single system. Dr. Parsons turned his focus to the various types of 3D-printed circuits, which can greatly increase functionality. He noted that being able to produce and seamlessly integrate the connectors into the circuit allows for more complicated RF structures, and then he concluded that it’s critical for the future needs to have materials development.


The webinar concluded with a detailed and interesting Q&A session, and I left with a strong feeling that 3D-printed electronic manufacturing not only has advanced significantly in the past few years, but the rate of advance is increasing exponentially.

These presentations were so loaded with information on both present and future uses of 3D additive circuit and device production, and all I can do here is give you a few highlights. The entire webinar is about two hours and can be viewed online [1].

Also, I have recently seen some companies announce other advances in both equipment and consumables, so I look forward to covering this topic in even greater detail.


  1. The Strength of 3D-Printed Electronics,” nScrypt Inc.



Suggested Items

I-Connect007 Editor’s Choice: Five Must-Reads for the Week

04/16/2021 | Nolan Johnson, I-Connect007
I’m sure it’s just me being hyperaware, but I can’t shake it: Mars is where it’s at right now. Is it just me, or do you get the same feeling from the news? There are the Mars rovers—three generations of them still rolling, now—and a drone helicopter winding up for a maiden flight any day now. But that’s not all. There’s SpaceX’s StarShip, rapid-prototyping its way into a manned flight to Mars. And NASA’s whole “return to the Moon” project is simply a shakedown for the U.S. government contractors’ Mars flight hardware, too.

Top Five Takeaways from IPC APEX EXPO 2021

04/15/2021 | Chris Mitchell, IPC VP, Global Government Relations
IPC APEX EXPO 2021, which went all virtual this year, exemplified how the electronics industry has responded to the COVID-19 global pandemic: with resiliency, agility, and an unwavering commitment to build electronics better. APEX EXPO featured great content and robust discussions on topics of critical importance to the global electronics industry. From my vantage point leading IPC’s government relations programs, here are my top five takeaways from this year’s event.

IPC Supporting Newcomers in the Industry: Notes from IPC APEX EXPO 2021

04/01/2021 | Marc Carter, Aeromarc
With the wrap-up of IPC APEX EXPO 2021, it was extremely gratifying to note the emphasis placed on getting young people involved to combat the “graying out” knowledge losses facing our industry. A part of that emphasis was reflected in the award ceremony on Tuesday, March 9, which featured some people you may have seen mentioned in my “Better to Light a Candle” columns.

Copyright © 2021 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.