Defense Speak Interpreted: The Defense Innovation Unit

Many of my columns are about new defense technologies and innovations. What about an organization with “innovation” in its name? In this column, I’ll describe the history and purpose of the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU), as well as some of its programs.

According to its website [1], “The Defense Innovation Unit (DIU) strengthens our national security by accelerating the adoption of commercial technology throughout the military and growing the national security innovation base. DIU partners with organizations across the Department of Defense (DoD), from the services and components to combatant commands and defense agencies, to rapidly prototype and field advanced commercial solutions that address national security challenges…The DIU connects its DoD partners with leading technology companies across the country.”

The DIU was launched in 2015 to significant publicity by Ashton Carter, the defense secretary at the time. The rallying cry was, “Silicon Valley is ignoring the DoD.” The belief was that domestic commercial electronics technology was being implemented, and high-tech companies did not want to do business with the DoD for a variety of reasons. In my opinion, some of that criticism was well-earned, considering the laborious contracting process of Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR).

Personally, I have found that the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) process is fine when the Pentagon wants to order more of the same item they are already acquainted with. However, there are a variety of reasons why traditional FAR procurement fails at buying research work or first prototype articles:

  • The amount of research time is not known to obtain the answer (if ever).
  • The number of prototype iterations is unknown.
  • “We can’t tolerate any failures,” so only small incremental improvements are specified in development contracts, while the electronics industry is used to “big leaps and breakthroughs.”
  • The traditional acquisition process involves submitting ideas, waiting until a bid spec is drawn up, having to go through a down-select of potential technology suppliers, submitting a painful final proposal, waiting for months for a contract award, and finally waiting even longer for contract money to flow for the work. This laborious process can take two years or more. At the pace of electronics development, sometimes the technology awarded under contract is already being supplanted by newer technology.
  • In DIU’s own words [1], “We aim to move from problem identification to prototype contract award in 60–90 days whereas the traditional DoD contracting process often takes more than 18 months. Prototype projects typically run from 12–24 months…Upon completion, successful prototypes may transition to follow-on production, OTA, or FAR-based contracts.”

The DIU was first known as the Defense Innovation Unit eXperimental (DIUx), which was founded as an other transactional authority (OTA) from the start. There had been prior defense OTA contracts before DIUx, but DIUx had great national publicity right from the Pentagon and with the blessing of the White House [2].

The core of DIU is “focused exclusively on fielding and scaling commercial technology across the U.S. military at commercial speeds.” The DIU has down-selected five technology areas where the commercial sector is operating at the leading edge, including [1]:

  • Artificial intelligence (AI)
  • Autonomy of operations
  • Cybersecurity
  • Human systems
  • Space

The DIU also has three principles [1]:

  1. Integrity: DoD access to advanced commercial technology depends on mutually beneficial business processes. We ensure a competitive process that is open and fair to all participants.
  2. Initiative: We’re in a technology race with our adversaries, and speed is critical. Our team builds processes that allow us to move fast and deliver trusted, scalable solutions.
  3. Impact: Our value to the military and to the companies we work with is based on delivering results. We know our metrics and assess our results to continuously improve our performance.

The DIU was originally founded in and still headquartered in Mountain View (Silicon Valley), but branch DIU offices were quickly established in Boston, Austin, and—most recently—the Pentagon. The Pentagon office focuses on the needs within defense while the other three survey emerging commercial technology across the U.S.

The DIU functions as something of a “marriage maker” to identify and understand critical national security challenges and marry those with leading-edge commercial technology within the target 12–24 months, especially in small companies. In following up after a successful prototype, the demonstrating company can now move to a follow on procurement/production contract much more easily.

The DIU’s special emphasis (a metric in performance) is to work with companies that have never before done business with the DoD or U.S. government. By February 2020, the DIU already introduced 122 non-traditional defense contractors, and 66 had their first time in dealing with the DoD. Proposals came from 44 different states [3]. Remember, the DIU is focused on demonstrated commercial-only technology. There is little emphasis on traditional inventions or process developments that symbolize pure or applied research.

Another approach to development that the DIU plans is the National Security Innovation Capital (NSIC) effort. This recognizes that venture capital—a worrisome amount coming from overseas and including adversary countries—is critical to technology success [3]. This program is authorized in the existing National Defense Appropriation Act (NDAA), but funding depends on the exact language to be found in the forthcoming final 2021 NDAA. Defense Research and Engineering requested $75 million for NSIC in the FY 2020 NDAA.

The next, but slightly different, DIU program is the National Security Innovation Network (NSIN). This previously was known as MD5 [4] with more emphasis on university participation in the “secure communications” effort than just commercial entities traditional in either the DIU or NISC [5].

In contrast to NISC (with emphasis on monetary capital), the emphasis of NSIN is on human capital—hence the work with universities. Perhaps the most newsworthy—and controversial—activity of MD5 or NSIN are the “hackathons” it has sponsored to promote “white hat” efforts to point out weaknesses in DoD software and communications systems.

Organizationally, the DIU has had several leaders throughout its existence. In 2015, the founder was Maynard Holliday. In May 2016, Ashton Carter, defense secretary, grabbed DIUx and had it report directly to his office. The managing DIUx partner was Raj Shah until February 2018. After a short period of interim directors, Michael Brown took over DIU and dropped the “x” in September of 2018; he remains the DIU director. Brown came from the White House and was instrumental in the establishment of the NSIC effort. Now supervising the DIU is the undersecretary of defense for research and engineering. On July 10 of this year, USD for R&E Michael Griffin left the Pentagon, and Michael Kratsios is now serving as interim USD for R&E [6].

Of course, someone in Washington is going to ask, “What are we getting for the DIU money you are spending?” Annually, the DIU issues a public report on its activities. However, analysis is required, and yardsticks for performance are drawn up. One such analysis is provided online [7].

At that point, almost a year ago, some 23% of completed projects (authorized between 2016 and report date) had moved to defense applications—10 of 43. Approximately 63 other projects were incomplete as of that report date. The article author also interviewed three Silicon Valley venture managers, and the report is that Silicon Valley’s expectation is that roughly 33% of ventures move forward compared to the 23% DIU experience. You must also remember that a high percentage of the DIU awards are to companies with little or no experience dealing with defense, so count for a learning curve both from DIU and small technology venture companies being awarded.

The real yardstick for the DIU and its NSIC and NSIN programs in the final FY 21 NDAA budget. Will Congress and the White House be satisfied with DIU progress and fully fund its requests? Then, there are signs that Washington is also not too happy with the pace of technology at traditional defense contractors [8].

While this General Accounting Office study of defense primes shows where they spend their own internal research (not granted by DoD). The report [8] found, “Coincidently, ‘our analysis also showed that the majority (67%) of IR&D projects completed between 2014 and 2018 focused on incremental, rather than disruptive, innovation.’” The Pentagon may be saying, “If you are not planting your own seed corn in disruptive innovation, why should we give you billions of tax dollars on top of that?” Stay tuned.

References

  1. The DIU, “Defense Innovation Unit.”
  2. Wikipedia, “Defense Innovation Unit.”
  3. Jon Harper, “Defense Innovation Unit Shifts Into Higher Gear,” National Defense, February 11, 2020.
  4. MD5 Adopts New Name to Reflect Refined Mission,” NSIN, May 6, 2019.
  5. Wikipedia, “National Security Innovation Network.”
  6. Wikipedia, “Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering.”
  7. Scott Maucione, “SPECIAL REPORT: Failure is an option for DoD’s experimental agency, but how much?” Federal News Network, October 30, 2019.
  8. Patrick Tucker, “Pentagon, Defense Contractors Are Out Of Step On Tech Innovation, GAO Finds,” Defense One, September 3, 2020.

Dennis Fritz was a 20-year direct employee of MacDermid Inc. and is retired after 12 years as a senior engineer at (SAIC) supporting the Naval Surface Warfare Center in Crane, Indiana. He was elected to the IPC Hall of Fame in 2012.

Back

2020

Defense Speak Interpreted: The Defense Innovation Unit

09-22-2020

Many of Denny Fritz's columns are about new defense technologies and innovations, but what about an organization with “innovation” in its name? Here, he describes the history and purpose of the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU), as well as some of its programs.

View Story

Defense Speak Interpreted: Unpacking the NDAA

08-25-2020

What is this NDAA stuff you keep hearing on the national news all the time, and why is it important to PCBs? Denny Fritz explains what is going on with the National Defense Authorization Act, which authorizes programs and lays out the priorities and policies for the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).

View Story

Defense Speak Interpreted: DMEA

07-14-2020

A June 17 article announced a supply chain award of $10.7 billion to eight defense companies for semiconductors. Dennis Fritz explains how the Defense Microelectronics Agency (DMEA) administers this contract and keeps the technology secure.

View Story

Defense Speak Interpreted: C4ISR

06-16-2020

Only the U.S. Defense Department would lump together seven concepts—command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance—into a single acronym: C4ISR. Denny Fritz explains how C4ISR has been called the “nervous system” of the military.

View Story

Defense Speak Interpreted: What’s an RCV, and What Do Electronics Have to Do With It?

05-12-2020

In "Defense Speak," RCV does not stand for ranked-choice voting, a remote control vehicle, a riot control vehicle, or a refuse collection vehicle, although the second one is close; it stands for a remote combat vehicle. Denny Fritz explores this concept and its defense applications.

View Story

Defense Speak Interpreted: Why Is Defense Hyper Over Hypersonics?

04-14-2020

Perhaps you have noticed that the term “hypersonics” is now a buzz phrase in a big part of the Department of Defense research effort. What does hypersonic mean, and why is so much work needed in this weapons field? Dennis Fritz explains.

View Story

Defense Speak Interpreted: Be Prepared for CMMC

03-24-2020

If you are a current or future Defense Department contractor or subcontractor, you need to be prepared for the next cybersecurity requirements coming online during 2020. This is the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification, or CMMC, in Defense speak. Dennis Fritz explains how there will be five levels of cybersecurity requirements for various amounts of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) you handle, with increasing requirements from one (least) to five (most).

View Story

Defense Speak Interpreted: The Missile Defense Agency

02-25-2020

The Missile Defense Agency (MDA) has its roots in the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), known as 'Star Wars' in the 1980s as proposed by President Ronald Reagan. In this column, Denny Fritz provides an overview of how the MDA operates and describes types of missiles and phases.

View Story

Defense Speak Interpreted: What in the World Is MINSEC?

01-14-2020

The Defense program designated MINSEC (Microelectronics Innovation for National Security and Economic Competitiveness) is probably one that you have never heard of but will likely gather more headlines in the future. Dennis Fritz explains.

View Story
Back

2019

Defense Speak Interpreted: The Continuing Resolution

12-10-2019

The topic of the continuing resolution (CR) has been sneaking past other hot Washington topics, such as impeachment, candidate debates, and why the Redskins are so bad. Dennis Fritz provides an update concerning a CR and the 2020 fiscal year.

View Story

Defense Speak Interpreted: Executive Agent

11-12-2019

After reading my previous column, you may have realized that electronics packaging technology development came from the Naval Surface Warfare Center in Crane, Indiana. One of its core responsibilities is the assignment of “executive agent” for PCBs and electronic interconnects. But what is this “executive agent” thing, frequently shortened to EA? Dennis Fritz explains.

View Story

Defense Speak Interpreted: PCB-related OTAs from NAVSEA Crane

10-29-2019

In my previous column, I described how Other Transaction Authority (OTA) projects were speeding up the development of new technology for the Defense Department. Much of this improvement has to do with the speed of contracting and the less restrictive selection and payment process involved. Specifically, I would like to call out projects under the National Security Technology Accelerator (NSTXL).

View Story

Defense Speak Interpreted: Other Transaction Authority

09-19-2019

DIU grants contracts under a joint OTA and a parallel process called commercial solutions opening. Most of the five DIU focus areas depend on electronics: artificial intelligence (AI), autonomy, cyber, human systems, and space. At the end of 2018, DIU had funded 104 contracts with a total value of $354 million and brought in 87 non-traditional DoD vendors, including 43 contracting with DoD for the first time.

View Story

Defense Speak Interpreted: DARPA ERI

01-29-2019

DARPA ERI stands for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and the Electronics Resurgence Initiative. This tongue-twisting acronym is the latest Department of Defense (DoD) effort to catch up and surpass world semiconductor technology for the secure IC chips needed by advanced defense electronics systems.

View Story
Back

2018

Defense Speak Interpreted: PERM—Pb-free Electronics Risk Management

12-18-2018

In this column, we explore PERM—the Pb-free Electronics Risk Management Consortium. No, the group members do not all have curly hair! The name was chosen around 2008 by a group of engineers from aerospace, defense, and harsh environment (ADHE) organizations.

View Story

Defense Speak Interpreted: Defense Electronic Supply Chain Issues

10-18-2018

On October 5, 2018, the Department of Defense (DoD) highlighted issues with the release of the 146-page report “Assessing and Strengthening the Manufacturing and Defense Industrial Base and Supply Chain Resiliency of the United States” from President Donald J. Trump

View Story
Copyright © 2020 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.