One World, One Industry: Three Ways to Close the Skills Gap in U.S. Manufacturing

The skills gap is a chronic problem in the manufacturing sector. Most manufacturing companies have a hard time aligning the talent needed to run their businesses with the talent that is available to work locally. And as new innovations emerge, new skills requirements emerge as well.

A new report[1] from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine cites employer surveys and numerous industry and government reports in reaching the conclusion that the nation has an inadequate supply of skilled technical workers to achieve its competitiveness and economic growth objectives.

In our sector, according to a 2015 study[2] by the Manufacturing Institute, nearly 3.5 million manufacturing jobs are expected to become available in the United States over the next decade as current workers retire and the economy grows. Unfortunately, the skills gap is expected to leave 2 million of these jobs unfilled.

As an association that represents thousands of member facilities across the electronics industry supply chain, we decided to survey[3] our U.S. members [EMS companies] to gain insight into how the skills gap affects them. The results indicate that most of our member companies have trouble finding applicants with the necessary experience and technical skills.

Among production jobs, general assembler and hand solderer are the most difficult to fill. On the professional side, quality control, process and entry-level electrical engineers have been hardest to find. Insufficient experience is the most common reason that applicants do not qualify for most positions. However, for many technical professional positions, the leading reason jobs went unfilled was that there were no applicants at all.

Respondents cite many essential skills that are in short supply, but the most common ones are soldering for production jobs, and engineers with industry experience, especially in process, test, and quality control. Two-thirds of our member companies reported they would expand their operations if they knew that finding qualified workers would be no problem. Thus, finding solutions to the skills gap is a high priority if America wants to expand its manufacturing sector.

First, we need to do a better job of engaging kids in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) topics in elementary and middle school. Unfortunately, the Common Core standards[4] adopted by 44 states typically cover only language and math, with nothing on science and technology. Rather than attacking those standards, as some have done, policymakers should expand them and incentivize STEM teaching from kindergarten through 12th grade.

And America’s educational standards should be tougher. Other nations set a high bar, pushing their youth to the top of the world rankings. Only by building U.S. students’ skills and confidence in STEM subjects in their youth can the United States compete globally and build a solid pipeline of future engineers.

Second, we need to get rid of the notion that the only successful education is a liberal arts degree from college. Many noble and lucrative careers can be had by those who learn trades and technical specialties. In Germany, companies like Siemens and Bosch use apprenticeships to train their workers in advanced engineering and manufacturing. The model is used in professions like hospitality and banking as well. Such apprenticeship programs exist in the United States, but on a much smaller scale. Rather than cutting government funding for these programs, leaders in education and business should work together to build them up. IPC supports the bipartisan Strengthening Career and Technical Education for the 21st Century Act, H.R. 2353[5], which is making its way through Congress and would provide federal support for career education programs.

These steps are urgently needed, along with a broader strategy to ensure that continuous training is a high priority in our industry. And third, there is much that we, the companies in our industry, can do on our own. We can host site visits or tours of our facilities and open our doors to local schools and the surrounding community to illustrate the importance of the electronics industry for the global economy. We can also develop a program or presentation to engage students and interest them in engineering careers. Companies may also offer intern programs for high school and college students. Additionally, IPC offers dozens of courses online and in-person, providing knowledge and certifications that can take current workers to the next level in their careers.

Only by raising the educational bar and building a stronger network of technical training programs can the United States hope to develop the workforce that it needs to compete in the global economy.


1. Building America’s Skilled Technical Workforce, the National Academies Press.

2. The skills gap in U.S. manufacturing: 2015 and beyond, the Manufacturing Institute.

3. IPC survey: Findings on the Skills Gap in U.S. Electronics Manufacturing—2017D1 (available for purchase).

4. Common Core Standards—About the Standards

5. H.R.2353—Strengthening Career and Technical Education for the 21st Century Act


John Mitchell is president and CEO of IPC—Association Connecting Electronics Industries. To read past columns or to contact Mitchell, click here

Editor's Note: This column originally appeared in the July 2017 issue of The PCB Magazine, click here.



One World, One Industry: Three Ways to Close the Skills Gap in U.S. Manufacturing


The skills gap is a chronic problem in the manufacturing sector. Most manufacturing companies have a hard time aligning the talent needed to run their businesses with the talent that is available to work locally. And as new innovations emerge, new skills requirements emerge as well.

View Story

One World, One Industry: Having an Impact from the Shop Floor to the Halls of Government


When you have concerns about government regulations and policies that impact your business, what can you do? Among several options, a direct approach is one of the best: Reach out to your elected officials and share your concerns. The odds are good that they will be responsive and look into ways of helping out a hometown business.

View Story

China—A Critical Partner for Trade


Count me among those business leaders who thought the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) was on the right track last year and would have brought significant benefits to all nations, including the United States. Before President Trump withdrew the United States from the TPP trade negotiations, I had argued it would have unified the world’s most dynamic economic region—bringing together developed and developing countries that collectively represent 825 million consumers and 40% of the world’s economic output.

View Story

One World, One Industry: 100 Days In—President Trump and a Better Manufacturing Policy


To truly increase the number of American manufacturing jobs, President Trump should support increased investment in research and development for advanced manufacturing, promote and fund STEM education in primary and secondary schools, and build stronger apprenticeship programs. It is this type of investment—in human capital and technology—that will truly help make American manufacturing great again.

View Story

One World, One Industry: IPC’s Global Policy Framework for 2017—Smart Advocacy for the Industry


As President Trump was being sworn in several weeks ago, and as the new Congress was getting down to work, IPC released its Global Policy Framework for 2017. As we work to represent more than 3,800 member facilities across the electronics industry’s global supply chain, IPC will adhere to this framework to guide our policy work in the coming months. All of our advocacy efforts are aimed at fostering an environment in which electronics manufacturers and their suppliers can thrive and grow.

View Story

One World, One Industry: Emerging Technology, Training for the Future, and the Next Industrial Revolution


Technology isn’t just a tangible entity. It moves beyond what we can see, feel, and touch. It is ideas and theories. It includes philosophy and risks. In a way, technology itself is like the stock market. Different industries hedge their bets on emerging trends. These trends develop into useful products that change our world.

View Story

One World, One Industry: Implications of the Trump Presidency


Our biggest concern is the impact on international trade. Specifically, President-elect Trump has said he would drop U.S. participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), put a hold on the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (T-TIP), seek to renegotiate NAFTA, slap higher tariffs on imports from China, and seek greater penalties on nations accused of dumping products or raw materials and committing intellectual property violations.

View Story


One World, One Industry: Strengthening Your Value Proposition to Boost Organization Success


John Mitchell's new column's title says it all: One World, One Industry. In the coming columns, the IPC president will be covering issues affecting the entire global electronics industry supply chain with specific expertise on global standards, education, advocacy and solutions.

View Story

One World, One Industry: Six Leadership Lessons from 20 Years in the Electronics Industry


The orchestra conductor is an apt metaphor for the successful leader. Effective leadership often boils down to the ability to inspire others (the symphony) to their best work, while keeping and driving the overall vision of the organization (the musical score).

View Story

One World, One Industry: Voting — A Civic Duty and Industry Opportunity


On Tuesday, November 8, more than 240 million people in the United States will have the opportunity to go to the polls and vote, make their voices heard in government, and influence the direction of public policy for years to come. Much of the world is closely watching with interest in this major U.S. election.

View Story
Copyright © 2017 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.