A Scientific Response to Mr. Laminate Tells All


Reading time ( words)

We read with interest Doug Sober’s recent Mr. Laminate Tells All column, The Certification of IPC-4101D Polyimide Base Materials: Buyer Beware

The article raises interesting questions about the IPC 4101 classification system, primarily, how is a pure resin defined? 

For thermosetting materials, the “resin system” includes at least a resin and a curing system, which can take many forms—can this be defined as pure? 

“Purity” is a term generally applied to single compounds, especially in inorganic chemistry. To broadly apply this term to complex organic resin systems, which may contain multiple curing chemistries, inert and active fillers, and flame retardant components, is stretching the term beyond the breaking point. 

Let us consider materials classified under IPC 4101/126 for example. The specification sheet states the following: 

The primary resin system is listed as “Epoxy,” with a secondary of multifunctional epoxy or modified epoxy or non-epoxy (max. wt. 5%). However, for base materials’ manufacturers to meet the performance requirements of lead-free FR-4 and high decomposition temperature, it has been standard practice for base materials manufacturers to replace the previously common dicyandiamide curing element with a phenolic resin in /126 materials. The phenolic resin element is typically present in double-digit weight percentage proportions; these products are openly referred to as “phenolic cured epoxies.” If the argument about purity of resins were applied in the same way as in the polyimide example, then all manufacturers of /126 materials should be declared as having a secondary resin system outside of the specification requirements, and would therefore be non-compliant. 

The only argument that allows base materials manufacturers to claim /126 compliance with such a high percentage of non-compliant secondary resins relates to the nature of the organic molecule. The argument is that many species may be used in the formulation, but in the final reacted state there is one molecule, which had epoxy functionality prior to curing (by definition, the presence of an epoxy functional group), and can therefore be correctly classed as an epoxy resin. To quote the article, “there is only one big molecule with the largest portion being the polyimide functionality. So it is a pure polyimide at that point. That argument does not hold any water…”  We can just as easily replace the term “polyimide” with “epoxy” and we have the statement “there is only one big molecule with the largest portion being the epoxy functionality. So it is a pure epoxy at that point. That argument does not hold any water…” By inference, the author must also support the argument to disbar /126 materials that use a phenolic curing element, which is most, if not all of them. 

Polyimide is, by definition, a polymer that contains imide groups. Polyimide resins form a family of chemistries, aliphatic or aromatic; they may be thermoplastic or form part of a thermosetting system and may or may not include flame retardant components. Using the same arguments above, for epoxy, the final reacted state is one molecule that contains a polymer that contained a functional group consisting of two acyl groups bound to nitrogen (an imide). It is just the same argument for /126 epoxies above; what is true for /126 must also be true for /40 /41. 

To reinforce this distinction one should also not forget that in the final condition, no functional epoxy or imide groups exist at all as they will have all reacted as part of the crosslinking process. It is truly “one big molecule.” 

Far from “using their own rules for substitutions” and saying “you (IPC) cannot stop us,” the laminators concerned (of which Ventec is just one) are applying a consistent and scientifically correct approach to the formulation of both polyimide and epoxy resin systems. And if a “special case” is being argued for /40/41 materials that somehow does not apply to /126 materials, then the buyer must truly beware of using the IPC 4101 slash sheet classification system at all. 

 

Mark Goodwin is CCO, EMEA & Europe with Ventec International Group.              

Bill Wang is technical director with Ventec International Group.                 

Share


Suggested Items

Global Impact on European PCB Fabrication: EIPC Summer Conference 2017, Day 2

06/15/2017 | Pete Starkey, I-Connect007
The second day saw the conference room full once more, the late networking session in the bar having resulted in no significant casualties, and I was pleased to accept the invitation to moderate the first session, on processes and materials for flexible PCBs.

RTW IPC APEX EXPO: ERP System Helps Gardien Ensure Global Consistency in Quality Assurance Services

03/28/2017 | Real Time with...IPC
How does a global provider of quality assurance services to the PCB industry give its customers the peace of mind that no matter where they utilize its services that they will always be to the same consistent high standard? Gardien Global VP of Quality Rick Meraw explains the benefits of an in-house-developed ERP system in driving efficiency and best practice throughout the organization.

Catching up with…Nessis Inc. President Kathleen Niles

01/24/2017 | Dan Beaulieu, D.B. Management Group
When I checked in on one of my old PCB sales associates recently, he told me that he had a new gig selling the latest and greatest new productivity software tools. He spoke so highly about Nessis Inc. and what their tools could do for companies, especially PCB shops, that I decided to learn more. I arranged to talk with Kathleen Niles, the co-founder and president of Nessis Inc. Here is a portion of that conversation.



Copyright © 2017 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.